๐…๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐“๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ? ๐Ž๐ซ ๐๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐“๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ค๐ข๐ง๐  ๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฃ๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐…๐จ๐ซ๐ฐ๐š๐ซ๐?

6/6/20261 min read

One of the hardest things about imagining the future is realizing how trapped we are by the present.

We don't just look ahead. We drag today's assumptions with us. Psychologists call it ๐ซ๐ž๐œ๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ฒ ๐›๐ข๐š๐ฌ, and it works like gravity, pulling our imagination back toward what feels familiar.

Take the debate about AI and jobs.
One side points to strong job numbers and says the labor market is just fine. The other points to struggling graduates, announced AI-linked layoffs as proof the disruption is already here.

Both are describing something real. But neither tells us much about the future.

When a transformative technology arrives, we ask narrow questions: which jobs shrink, which grow, which industries adapt. Useful, but incomplete.

Because ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐Ÿ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ž ๐ซ๐š๐ซ๐ž๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฐ๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ฉ ๐š๐ฌ ๐š ๐ฌ๐ฅ๐ข๐ ๐ก๐ญ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ ๐ซ๐š๐๐ž๐ ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ญ๐จ๐๐š๐ฒ.

When the internet first appeared, who truly pictured social media, the creator economy, smartphones as extensions of ourselves, digital identities, remote work at scale, or entirely new forms of status and labor?

Almost no one. Not for lack of intelligence. Our imagination was caged by the assumptions of that time.

That's why I like a question Jane McGonigal raises in her book Imaginable:

๐–๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ข๐Ÿ ๐จ๐ง๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ˆ ๐ญ๐š๐ค๐ž ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ ๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐๐š๐ฒ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ซ ๐ญ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ž ๐ข๐ง ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ ๐ฒ๐ž๐š๐ซ๐ฌ?

It loosens the grip of today's "obvious" truths. Once those assumptions move, futures that look unrealistic, even ridiculous, become easier to examine and to prepare for.

๐€๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฆ๐ž๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐ž๐ฌ ๐๐จ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐›๐ž๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ง ๐ž๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ž๐ซ๐ญ๐ฌ.

In 1999, David Bowie told a skeptical BBC interviewer the internet was not "just a tool" but "an alien life form", and that its impact would be "unimaginable". He saw past the tool, into the cultural shift.

That word, unimaginable, is the whole point.

The real work isn't predicting perfectly. It's ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐ž๐ญ๐œ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐  ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐ข๐ฆ๐š๐ ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง far enough that we're less ambushed when the impossible becomes normal.

What assumption about today's world do you think is most likely to be wrong 10 years from now?

#FutureThinking #AIandWork #Imagination #RecencyBias #Foresight #ArtistMindset

Contact

bruno.gentil@sherpaconsultingasia.com

ยฉ 2026. All rights reserved.